Aiken v. State

264 S.E.2d 336, 152 Ga. App. 662, 1979 Ga. App. LEXIS 2998
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided December 3, 1979·No. 58839·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Shulman, Judge.

The sole enumeration of error in this appeal from appellants’ convictions of armed robbery is on the general [663]*663grounds. Since the evidence, when viewed in the light most favorable to the prosecution, would have authorized a jury to find appellants guilty of armed robbery beyond a reasonable doubt, the judgment is affirmed under Rule 36 of the rules of this court (Code Ann. § 24-3636).

Submitted November 5, 1979 — Decided December 3, 1979. J. Douglas Willix, for appellants. Lewis R. Slaton, District Attorney, Joseph J. Drolet, Assistant District Attorney, for appellee.

Judgment affirmed.

Deen, C. J., and Carley, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Aiken v. State, 264 S.E.2d 336, 152 Ga. App. 662, 1979 Ga. App. LEXIS 2998 (Ga. Ct. App. 1979).

264 S.E.2d 336 (Aiken v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Clarke v. Zant
275 S.E.2d 49 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1981)
Burkes v. State
269 S.E.2d 496 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1980)