Aiken v. State
This text of 264 S.E.2d 336 (Aiken v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The sole enumeration of error in this appeal from appellants’ convictions of armed robbery is on the general [663]*663grounds. Since the evidence, when viewed in the light most favorable to the prosecution, would have authorized a jury to find appellants guilty of armed robbery beyond a reasonable doubt, the judgment is affirmed under Rule 36 of the rules of this court (Code Ann. § 24-3636).
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
264 S.E.2d 336, 152 Ga. App. 662, 1979 Ga. App. LEXIS 2998, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/aiken-v-state-gactapp-1979.