Aiken v. State
264 S.E.2d 336, 152 Ga. App. 662, 1979 Ga. App. LEXIS 2998
Opinion
The sole enumeration of error in this appeal from appellants’ convictions of armed robbery is on the general [663]*663grounds. Since the evidence, when viewed in the light most favorable to the prosecution, would have authorized a jury to find appellants guilty of armed robbery beyond a reasonable doubt, the judgment is affirmed under Rule 36 of the rules of this court (Code Ann. § 24-3636).
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Aiken v. State, 264 S.E.2d 336, 152 Ga. App. 662, 1979 Ga. App. LEXIS 2998 (Ga. Ct. App. 1979).
264 S.E.2d 336 (Aiken v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Clarke v. Zant
275 S.E.2d 49 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1981)
Burkes v. State
269 S.E.2d 496 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1980)