Aiken v. Hyman
478 U.S. 1016, 92 L. Ed. 2d 734, 106 S. Ct. 3327, 54 U.S.L.W. 3866, 1986 U.S. LEXIS 2712
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedJuly 7, 1986
DocketNo. 85-1461; No. 85-6638
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases
This text of 478 U.S. 1016 (Aiken v. Hyman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Aiken v. Hyman, 478 U.S. 1016, 92 L. Ed. 2d 734, 106 S. Ct. 3327, 54 U.S.L.W. 3866, 1986 U.S. LEXIS 2712 (1986).
Opinion
C. A. 4th Cir. Motions of William G. Hyman for leave to proceed informa pau-peris granted. Certiorari granted, judgment vacated, and cases [1017]*1017remanded for further consideration in light of Rose v. Clark, ante, p. 570, and Cabana v. Bullock, 474 U. S. 376 (1986). Reported below: 777 F. 2d 938.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Wilbert Lee Evans v. Charles Thompson, Superintendent
881 F.2d 117 (Fourth Circuit, 1989)
William Gibbs Hyman v. James Aiken, Warden, Cci, and Travis Medlock, Attorney General, State of South Carolina
824 F.2d 1405 (Fourth Circuit, 1987)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
478 U.S. 1016, 92 L. Ed. 2d 734, 106 S. Ct. 3327, 54 U.S.L.W. 3866, 1986 U.S. LEXIS 2712, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/aiken-v-hyman-scotus-1986.