Aiken v. Dodrill

Fourth Circuit

Aiken v. Dodrill

30 F. App'x 143

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided February 28, 2002·No. 01-8107·Unpublished·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Willie Aiken appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (1994) petition. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Aiken v. Dodrill, No. CA-01-811-5 (E.D.N.C. Nov. 6, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Willie Aiken appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (1994) petition. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Aiken v. Dodrill, No. CA-01-811-5 (E.D.N.C. Nov. 6, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Aiken v. Dodrill, 30 F. App'x 143 (4th Cir. 2002).

Pincite

30 F. App'x 143 (Aiken v. Dodrill) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related