Aiken v. Carroll

37 Tex. 73
Texas Supreme Court·Decided July 1, 1873·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinion

Ogden, J.

This suit was instituted by the suing out of an injunction, to stay the collection of certain taxes. A motion was made to dissolve the injunction in vacation, and the judge in vacation dissolved the injunction and dismissed the bill. This, according to the decision in Grant v. Chambers, 34 Texas, was such an error as will require a reversal of the judgment.

There is no law giving judges of the District Courts authority, in vacation or at chambers, to render final judgment in any cause pending in the District Court.

The judgment is reversed and the cause remanded.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Aiken v. Carroll, 37 Tex. 73 (Tex. 1873).

37 Tex. 73 (Aiken v. Carroll) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Bridgman v. Moore
183 S.W.2d 705 (Texas Supreme Court, 1944)
Sinclair Refining Co. v. McElree
52 S.W.2d 679 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1932)
Walker v. Meyers
266 S.W. 499 (Texas Supreme Court, 1924)
Meyers v. Walker
264 S.W. 314 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1924)
Ex Parte Ellis
40 S.W. 275 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1897)
Wagner v. Edmiston
1 White & W. 371 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1878)