Home/Supreme Court of South Carolina/Aiken Speir, Inc. v. Henry

Aiken Speir, Inc. v. Henry

486 S.E.2d 492, 326 S.C. 268, 1997 S.C. LEXIS 120
Supreme Court of South Carolina·Decided June 17, 1997·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

Petitioner seeks a writ of certiorari to review an order of the Court of Appeals reinstating respondent’s appeal in this matter. Pursuant to Rule 226(a), SCACR, this Court will review only final decisions of the Court of Appeals. Since the order reinstating the appeal is not a final decision in the matter, the petition for a writ of certiorari is denied.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

/s/ Ernest A. Finney, Jr., C.J.

/s/ Jean H. Toal, A.J.

/s/ James E. Moore, A.J.

/s/ John H. Waller, Jr., A.J.

/s/ E.C. Burnette, III, A.J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Aiken Speir, Inc. v. Henry, 486 S.E.2d 492, 326 S.C. 268, 1997 S.C. LEXIS 120 (S.C. 1997).

486 S.E.2d 492 (Aiken Speir, Inc. v. Henry) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Koon v. Clare
527 S.E.2d 357 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 2000)