Aiken Speir, Inc. v. Henry
486 S.E.2d 492, 326 S.C. 268, 1997 S.C. LEXIS 120
This text of 486 S.E.2d 492 (Aiken Speir, Inc. v. Henry) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Aiken Speir, Inc. v. Henry, 486 S.E.2d 492, 326 S.C. 268, 1997 S.C. LEXIS 120 (S.C. 1997).
Opinion
ORDER
Petitioner seeks a writ of certiorari to review an order of the Court of Appeals reinstating respondent’s appeal in this matter. Pursuant to Rule 226(a), SCACR, this Court will review only final decisions of the Court of Appeals. Since the order reinstating the appeal is not a final decision in the matter, the petition for a writ of certiorari is denied.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Koon v. Clare
527 S.E.2d 357 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 2000)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
486 S.E.2d 492, 326 S.C. 268, 1997 S.C. LEXIS 120, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/aiken-speir-inc-v-henry-sc-1997.