Aiken, Ex Parte Bryan Wheeler

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
DecidedMay 14, 2008
DocketAP-75,918
StatusPublished

This text of Aiken, Ex Parte Bryan Wheeler (Aiken, Ex Parte Bryan Wheeler) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Aiken, Ex Parte Bryan Wheeler, (Tex. 2008).

Opinion

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS NO. AP-75,918

EX PARTE BRYAN WHEELER AIKEN, Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS CAUSE NO. 30557A IN THE 18th DISTRICT COURT FROM JOHNSON COUNTY

Per curiam.

OPINION

Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the

clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte

Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of burglary of a

habitation and sentenced to twenty-five years’ imprisonment.

Applicant contends, inter alia, that he is being improperly denied a preliminary revocation

hearing.

Based on documentation provided by the parole division of the Texas Department of

Criminal Justice, the Applicant has not been given a preliminary revocation hearing because he allegedly has pending criminal charges in Tarrant County, Texas. However, this Court has held that,

even if a parolee has new charges pending, he is still entitled, under Gov’t Code § 508.2811, to a

preliminary hearing within a reasonable time to determine whether probable cause or reasonable

grounds exist which show that he violated the conditions of his parole. Ex parte Cordova, 235

S.W.3d 735 (Tex. Crim. App. 2007). The Court also held in Cordova that due process requires that

a preliminary hearing be held as promptly as convenient after a parolee has been arrested to

determine whether there is probable cause or reasonable grounds to believe that the arrested parolee

has committed the acts that would constitute a violation of parole conditions.1

We find that Applicant has not been given a preliminary hearing within a reasonable time and

order the Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Parole Division to give Applicant a preliminary

hearing within thirty (30) days of the issuance of this opinion.

Copies of this opinion shall be sent to the Texas Department of Criminal Justice–Correctional

Institutions Division and Parole Divisions.

Delivered: May 14, 2008 Do not publish

1 Citing to Morrissey v. Brewer, 408 U.S. 471, 485, 92 S.Ct. 2593, 2602 (1972).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Morrissey v. Brewer
408 U.S. 471 (Supreme Court, 1972)
Ex Parte Cordova
235 S.W.3d 735 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 2007)
Ex Parte Young
418 S.W.2d 824 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1967)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Aiken, Ex Parte Bryan Wheeler, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/aiken-ex-parte-bryan-wheeler-texcrimapp-2008.