Aiello v. Wills

509 So. 2d 1298, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1717, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 9372
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided July 15, 1987·No. No. BL-243·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

MILLS, Judge.

There is competent substantial evidence in the record supporting the deputy commissioner’s determination that at the time of the industrial accident the claimant was employed by only one employer, Johnny Aiello, who was operating one business at adjacent locations covered by one workers’ compensation insurance policy issued to “Johnny Aiello d/b/a Sugar Shack Lounge.”

We therefore find no merit in the issue raised on appeal. The issue raised on cross appeal is moot.

AFFIRMED.

WENTWORTH and BARFIELD, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Aiello v. Wills, 509 So. 2d 1298, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1717, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 9372 (Fla. Ct. App. 1987).

509 So. 2d 1298 (Aiello v. Wills) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Armstrong v. Data Processing Inst., Inc.
509 So. 2d 1298 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1987)