Aiello v. Tempera

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Aiello v. Tempera

73 A.D.2d 644, 423 N.Y.S.2d 453, 1979 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14467

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 17, 1979

StatusPublished

This text of 73 A.D.2d 644 (Aiello v. Tempera) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Aiello v. Tempera, 73 A.D.2d 644, 423 N.Y.S.2d 453, 1979 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14467 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1979).

Pincite

Opinion

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the respondent Assistant Deputy Commissioner of Labor of Suffolk County, dated January 16, 1979, which, after a hearing, found petitioner guilty of certain misconduct and dismissed him from his position. Determination confirmed and proceeding dismissed on the merits, without costs or disbursements. The matter was once before reviewed by this court when we determined that confirmation of the hearing officer’s recommendation of dismissal by the commissioner himself was improper in view of the latter’s personal involvement in the controversy. We remitted the matter for a de novo determination by a deputy commissioner based upon the original hearing record (Matter of Aiello v Tempera, 65 AD2d 791). Based upon the evidence adduced at the hearing, we find that the charge of misconduct and insubordination was fully supported in this record and that the penalty of dismissal was warranted. Titone, J. P., Mangano, Rabin and Gibbons, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the respondent Assistant Deputy Commissioner of Labor of Suffolk County, dated January 16, 1979, which, after a hearing, found petitioner guilty of certain misconduct and dismissed him from his position. Determination confirmed and proceeding dismissed on the merits, without costs or disbursements. The matter was once before reviewed by this court when we determined that confirmation of the hearing officer’s recommendation of dismissal by the commissioner himself was improper in view of the latter’s personal involvement in the controversy. We remitted the matter for a de novo determination by a deputy commissioner based upon the original hearing record (Matter of Aiello v Tempera, 65 AD2d 791). Based upon the evidence adduced at the hearing, we find that the charge of misconduct and insubordination was fully supported in this record and that the penalty of dismissal was warranted. Titone, J. P., Mangano, Rabin and Gibbons, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

73 A.D.2d 644, 423 N.Y.S.2d 453, 1979 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14467, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/aiello-v-tempera-nyappdiv-1979.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack