Aiello v. Smithtown Central School District

305 A.D.2d 435, 758 N.Y.S.2d 815
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 12, 2003·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Molia, J.), dated October 3, 2002, which denied its motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, the motion is granted, and the complaint is dismissed.

The infant plaintiff sustained injuries when, in the course of playing soccer during recess, she was struck in the eye with a ball that ricocheted off another student player.

Contrary to the plaintiffs’ contention, the alleged inadequate supervision by the defendant’s employee was not a proximate cause of the infant plaintiff’s injuries. Rather, the injuries were the result of a spontaneous and unforeseeable act committed by a fellow student (see Sangineto v Mamaroneck Union Free [436] School Dist., 282 AD2d 596 [2001]; Organ v Yorktown Cent. School Dist., 269 AD2d 374 [2000]).

The plaintiffs’ remaining contention is without merit. Santucci, J.P., Feuerstein, McGinity and Schmidt, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Aiello v. Smithtown Central School District, 305 A.D.2d 435, 758 N.Y.S.2d 815 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2003).

305 A.D.2d 435 (Aiello v. Smithtown Central School District) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Perez Ex Rel. Perez v. Comsewogue School District
141 A.D.3d 577 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2016)