Aiello v. Long Island College Hospital

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Aiello v. Long Island College Hospital

300 A.D.2d 607, 751 N.Y.S.2d 426

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 30, 2002

StatusPublished

This text of 300 A.D.2d 607 (Aiello v. Long Island College Hospital) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Aiello v. Long Island College Hospital, 300 A.D.2d 607, 751 N.Y.S.2d 426 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2002).

Pincite

Opinion

—In an action to recover damages for medical malpractice, the defendant Gervasio C. Bonoan appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the [608]*608Supreme Court, Kings County (J. Spodek, J.), dated June 25, 2002, as granted that branch of the plaintiffs’ motion which was for leave to serve and file a second amended bill of particulars.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in granting the plaintiffs leave to serve a second amended bill of particulars to include additional allegations in support of the theory of medical malpractice set forth in prior pleadings (see Jones v Lynch, 298 AD2d 499; Loadholt v Rams Beer & Soda, 273 AD2d 446; Risucci v Homayoon, 122 AD2d 260, 262). Florio, J.P., O’Brien, Friedmann, Adams and Crane, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—In an action to recover damages for medical malpractice, the defendant Gervasio C. Bonoan appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the [608]*608Supreme Court, Kings County (J. Spodek, J.), dated June 25, 2002, as granted that branch of the plaintiffs’ motion which was for leave to serve and file a second amended bill of particulars.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in granting the plaintiffs leave to serve a second amended bill of particulars to include additional allegations in support of the theory of medical malpractice set forth in prior pleadings (see Jones v Lynch, 298 AD2d 499; Loadholt v Rams Beer & Soda, 273 AD2d 446; Risucci v Homayoon, 122 AD2d 260, 262). Florio, J.P., O’Brien, Friedmann, Adams and Crane, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

300 A.D.2d 607, 751 N.Y.S.2d 426, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/aiello-v-long-island-college-hospital-nyappdiv-2002.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack