Ai Timsanico v. United States
This text of 336 F.2d 197 (Ai Timsanico v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
336 F.2d 197
AI TIMSANICO, Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES of America, Appellee.
No. 19121.
United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit.
September 19, 1964.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Idaho; Fred M. Taylor, Judge.
John R. Black, Richard R. Black, Black & Black, Pocatello, Idaho, for appellant.
Sylvan A. Jeppesen, U. S. Atty., Robert E. Bakes, Asst. U. S. Atty., Boise, Idaho, for appellee.
Before HAMLEY, KOELSCH, and BROWNING, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
Appellant appeals his conviction under 18 U.S.C. § 1153. We have examined the specifications of error in the light of the record and are satisfied that none have merit.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
336 F.2d 197, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ai-timsanico-v-united-states-ca9-1964.