Ahsanuddin v. Carde

2020 NY Slip Op 05442, 187 A.D.3d 426, 129 N.Y.S.3d 787
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedOctober 6, 2020
DocketIndex No. 25100/2016E Appeal No. 11943 Case No. 2019-5439
StatusPublished

This text of 2020 NY Slip Op 05442 (Ahsanuddin v. Carde) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ahsanuddin v. Carde, 2020 NY Slip Op 05442, 187 A.D.3d 426, 129 N.Y.S.3d 787 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2020).

Opinion

Ahsanuddin v Carde (2020 NY Slip Op 05442)
Ahsanuddin v Carde
2020 NY Slip Op 05442
Decided on October 06, 2020
Appellate Division, First Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided and Entered: October 06, 2020
Before: Friedman, J.P., Webber, Kern, Moulton, JJ.

Index No. 25100/2016E Appeal No. 11943 Case No. 2019-5439

[*1]Mohammed Ahsanuddin, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v

Edwin Carde, et al., Defendants-Respondents.


Richard J. Soleymanzadeh, P.C., Carle Place (Richard J. Soleymanzadeh of counsel), for appellant.

Law Offices of Joan Iacono, Bronxville (Joan Iacono of counsel), for respondent



Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Ruben Franco, J.), entered on or about July 9, 2019, which, inter alia, denied plaintiff's motion for summary judgment on his cause of action for specific performance of a contract to purchase real estate, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Plaintiff failed to establish prima facie that he substantially performed his contract obligations and was willing and able to perform his remaining obligations and that defendants were able to convey the property (see EMF Gen. Contr. Corp. v Bisbee, 6 AD3d 45, 51 [1st Dept 2004], lv denied 3 NY3d 607 [2004]). He submitted no proof that he possessed the financial means to close the sale (see e.g. SFT Realty LLC v Banner Realty Co. LLC, 169 AD3d 615 [1st Dept 2019]). He submitted no proof that the individual defendant, who signed the contract of sale in his personal capacity, was able

to transfer the property, which the record shows was owned by the corporate defendant.THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER

OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.

ENTERED: October 6, 2020



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

EMF General Contracting Corp. v. Bisbee
6 A.D.3d 45 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2004)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2020 NY Slip Op 05442, 187 A.D.3d 426, 129 N.Y.S.3d 787, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ahsanuddin-v-carde-nyappdiv-2020.