Ahrens v. Rosenfeld
This text of 178 A.D. 905 (Ahrens v. Rosenfeld) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. The facts.as stated in the complaint and as admitted by the demurrer, do not show receipt of the money for the purpose of conversion, or refusal to surrender the same to the plaintiff’s employer, or any demand therefor, and the history of the transaction intermediate the receipt of the money to the application for the warrant is absent. No opinion. Jenks, P. J., Thomas, Mills, Rich and Putnam, JJ., concurred.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
178 A.D. 905, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ahrens-v-rosenfeld-nyappdiv-1917.