Ahrens v. Guaranty Trust Co.

125 Misc. 443, 211 N.Y.S. 283, 1925 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 911
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York·Decided June 15, 1925·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam:

We are of the opinion that as the case went to the jury, there was no clearly stated instruction upon the subject of the time when the Statute of Limitations commenced to run. As matter of law, the statute commenced to run upon the date fixable as the date upon which a reasonable time expired within which defendant should have performed. We are of the opinion that, because of the conditions then prevalent in Europe and then obtaining in over-seas transmission, the period of reasonableness of time was fixable by the jury as matter of fact.

Judgment reversed and new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide the event.

All concur; present, Bijur, Mullan and Proskauer, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ahrens v. Guaranty Trust Co., 125 Misc. 443, 211 N.Y.S. 283, 1925 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 911 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1925).

125 Misc. 443 (Ahrens v. Guaranty Trust Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Brockhurst v. Ryan
2 Misc. 2d 747 (New York Supreme Court, 1955)