Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Ahrens v. Fussell

Ahrens v. Fussell

76 So. 3d 1127, 2012 WL 48150
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided January 9, 2012·No. 1D11-5768·Published

Opinion

76 So.3d 1127 (2012)

Thomas David AHRENS, Petitioner,
v.
Cheyanna Marie FUSSELL, Respondent.

No. 1D11-5768.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

January 9, 2012.

Joseph L. Mannikko, and E. Barbara Baris of Mannikko & Baris, Macclenny, for Petitioner.

H. Leon Holbrook, III of Blalock Holbrook & Akel, Jacksonville, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

DENIED. See R.M.C. v. D.C., ___ So.3d ___, 2012 WL 29155 (Fla. 1st DCA 2012).

VAN NORTWICK, THOMAS, and RAY, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ahrens v. Fussell, 76 So. 3d 1127, 2012 WL 48150 (Fla. Ct. App. 2012).

76 So. 3d 1127 (Ahrens v. Fussell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

R.M.C. v. D.C.
77 So. 3d 234 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2012)