Ahrens v. Bradford

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Ahrens v. Bradford

10 A.D.2d 722, 199 N.Y.S.2d 449, 1960 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11124

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 21, 1960

StatusPublished

This text of 10 A.D.2d 722 (Ahrens v. Bradford) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ahrens v. Bradford, 10 A.D.2d 722, 199 N.Y.S.2d 449, 1960 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11124 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1960).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action to recover a -balance alleged to be due for work, labor and services and on an account stated, in which counterclaims were interposed for an accounting and for other relief, an amended complaint was served for an accounting to which counterclaims were interposed for an accounting and for other relief. The appeals are (1) from an interlocutory judgment which, inter alla, directed appellant to account, and (2) from an order and judgment (one paper) granting respondents’ motion for final judgment, awarding final judgment, and denying appellant’s cross motion to vacate the hearing theretofore held before an Official Referee and all the proceedings had after May 1, 1959. Interlocutory judgment, and order and judgment (one paper) unanimously affirmed, with one bill of costs. No opinion. Present — Nolan, P. J., Ughetta, Kleinfeld, Christ and Brennan, JJ. [18 Misc 2d 1015.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action to recover a -balance alleged to be due for work, labor and services and on an account stated, in which counterclaims were interposed for an accounting and for other relief, an amended complaint was served for an accounting to which counterclaims were interposed for an accounting and for other relief. The appeals are (1) from an interlocutory judgment which, inter alla, directed appellant to account, and (2) from an order and judgment (one paper) granting respondents’ motion for final judgment, awarding final judgment, and denying appellant’s cross motion to vacate the hearing theretofore held before an Official Referee and all the proceedings had after May 1, 1959. Interlocutory judgment, and order and judgment (one paper) unanimously affirmed, with one bill of costs. No opinion. Present — Nolan, P. J., Ughetta, Kleinfeld, Christ and Brennan, JJ. [18 Misc 2d 1015.]

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

10 A.D.2d 722, 199 N.Y.S.2d 449, 1960 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11124, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ahrens-v-bradford-nyappdiv-1960.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack