Ahrens & Ott Manufacturing Co. v. Caire
5 Teiss. 154
Opinions
The issues involved herein are identical with those in Finlay Dicks & Co. Ltd. vs. Jean B. Caire et als. decided this day.
For the reasons therein assigned the preliminary writ of mandamus is rescinded and recalled and relator’s application is dismissed at their costs with the understanding that upon relator’s paying the clerk the legal charges for preparing, certifying and transmitting the record of appeal to this Court the clerk shall [155] thereupon comply with his duties.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Ahrens & Ott Manufacturing Co. v. Caire, 5 Teiss. 154 (La. Ct. App. 1907).
5 Teiss. 154 (Ahrens & Ott Manufacturing Co. v. Caire) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
James B. Blake" Cureton v. James H. "Jimmy" Cureton and Custom Metal Fabricators, Inc. "
Louisiana Court of Appeal, 2021
Tedeton v. Tedeton
87 So. 3d 914 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 2012)