Ahrenfeldt v. Miller

282 F. 944
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit
DecidedAugust 1, 1922
DocketNo. 2841
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 282 F. 944 (Ahrenfeldt v. Miller) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ahrenfeldt v. Miller, 282 F. 944 (3d Cir. 1922).

Opinion

WOOLLEY, Circuit Judge.

At the hearing in Garvan, as Alien Property Custodian, v. Commercial Trust Co. of New Jersey, 275 Fed. 841, the appellant, Charles J. Ahrenfeldt, presented a petition for leave to intervene and have determined by the District Court his claim to ownership of a part of the property in process of seizure. The District Court denied the petition, holding that the question sought to be litigated by Ahrenfeldt can be raised only after the demand of the Alien Property Custodian has been complied with, and then only by proceedings authorized by section 9 of the act, as amended June 5, 1920 (41 Stat. 977). 282 Fed. 943. That the District Court was right is established by the decisions of the Supreme Court in Central Union Trust Co. v. Garvan, 254 U. S. 554, 41 Sup. Ct. 214, 65 L. Ed. 403, and Stoehr v. Wallace, 255 U. S. 239, 41 Sup. Ct. 293, 65 L. Ed. 604.

The order is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Chemical Foundation, Inc.
294 F. 300 (D. Delaware, 1924)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
282 F. 944, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ahrenfeldt-v-miller-ca3-1922.