Aho v. DULUTH TRANSIT AUTHORITY

714 N.W.2d 428, 2006 Minn. LEXIS 336, 2006 WL 1493643
CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota
DecidedMay 24, 2006
DocketA06-490
StatusPublished

This text of 714 N.W.2d 428 (Aho v. DULUTH TRANSIT AUTHORITY) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Aho v. DULUTH TRANSIT AUTHORITY, 714 N.W.2d 428, 2006 Minn. LEXIS 336, 2006 WL 1493643 (Mich. 2006).

Opinion

ORDER

Based upon all the files, records and proceedings herein,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the decision of the Workers’ Compensation Court of Appeals filed March 1, 2006, be, and the same is, affirmed without opinion. See Hoff v. Kempton, 317 N.W.2d 361, 366 (Minn.1982) (summary affirmances have no precedential value because they do not commit the court to any particular point of view, doing no more than establishing the law of the case).

Employee is awarded $1,200 in attorney fees.

BY THE COURT:

/s/Sam Hanson Associate Justice

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hoff v. Kempton
317 N.W.2d 361 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1982)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
714 N.W.2d 428, 2006 Minn. LEXIS 336, 2006 WL 1493643, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/aho-v-duluth-transit-authority-minn-2006.