Ahnin v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Ahnin v. State

505 So. 2d 659, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1065, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 7698

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedApril 15, 1987

DocketNo. 86-985

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 505 So. 2d 659 (Ahnin v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ahnin v. State, 505 So. 2d 659, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1065, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 7698 (Fla. Ct. App. 1987).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The appellant, Vernroy Ahnin, was charged by grand jury indictment with two violations of the Florida Racketeering Influenced and Corrupt Organization Act (RICO). Specifically, Ahnin was charged in Count I of the indictment with violation of RICO and in Count II with criminal conspiracy to violate RICO. He was not charged, as were a number of the co-defendants, in Counts III and IV of the indictment.

Ahnin was sentenced, however, for each of the four counts contained in the indictment. He is correct in asserting that he cannot be sentenced for crimes for which he was not convicted. Moreover, the sentence entered must conform to the oral pronouncement of the trial court. Thomas v. State, 504 So.2d 20 (Fla. 2d DCA 1987).

Accordingly, we remand for correction of Ahnin’s written sentence.

LEHAN, A.C.J., and HALL and SANDERLIN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI