Ahnert v. Union Railway Co.
110 N.Y.S. 376
Opinion
The opinion testimony asked of plaintiff’s witness, to which defendant objected, would ordinarily have been inadmissible; but defendant’s cross-examination of the plaintiff along the same lines over plaintiff’s objection opened the door to otherwise incompetent proof. Van Ingen v. Mail & Express Pub. Co., 156 N. Y. 376, 388, 50 N. E. 979.
Judgment affirmed, with costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Ahnert v. Union Railway Co., 110 N.Y.S. 376 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1908).
110 N.Y.S. 376 (Ahnert v. Union Railway Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Van Ingen v. Mail & Express Publishing Co.
50 N.E. 979 (New York Court of Appeals, 1898)