Home/Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York/Ahnert v. Union Railway Co.

Ahnert v. Union Railway Co.

110 N.Y.S. 376
CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
DecidedMay 15, 1908
StatusPublished

This text of 110 N.Y.S. 376 (Ahnert v. Union Railway Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ahnert v. Union Railway Co., 110 N.Y.S. 376 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1908).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The opinion testimony asked of plaintiff’s witness, to which defendant objected, would ordinarily have been inadmissible; but defendant’s cross-examination of the plaintiff along the same lines over plaintiff’s objection opened the door to otherwise incompetent proof. Van Ingen v. Mail & Express Pub. Co., 156 N. Y. 376, 388, 50 N. E. 979.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Van Ingen v. Mail & Express Publishing Co.
50 N.E. 979 (New York Court of Appeals, 1898)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
110 N.Y.S. 376, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ahnert-v-union-railway-co-nyappterm-1908.