Ahmed v. Bush
This text of Ahmed v. Bush (Ahmed v. Bush) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
_____________________________ ) LABED AHMED, ) ) Petitioner, ) ) ) Civ. No. 05–1234 (EGS) v. ) ) GEORGE W. BUSH, et al., ) ) Respondents. ) _____________________________ )
ORDER
On December 8, 2008, the Court directed the government to
file a declaration providing the Court with information as to
Petitioner Labed Ahmed's status and well-being subsequent to his
transfer to Algeria. In response to that Order, on December 15,
2008 the government filed a declaration by Clint Williamson,
Ambassador-at-Large for War Crimes Issues, explaining that the
Department of State's "general practice" is to have the U.S.
embassy in the receiving country monitor the status of a
transferred detainee through various means. Ambassador
Williamson's declaration states that "[t]he [State] Department's
overriding concern, in following this approach, is ensuring that
the receiving government is in compliance with its assurances of
humane treatment and that the transferred detainee is, in fact,
not being subjected to mistreatment." With respect to Mr. Ahmed,
however, Ambassador Williamson’s declaration stated only that the
Department of State "has not received any information that would suggest that he has been mistreated or that Algeria is not in
compliance with its international legal obligations regarding the
humane treatment of this individual."
On February 2, 2009, Petitioner’s counsel filed a status
report informing the Court that counsel has learned from an
attorney in Algeria that all ex-detainees from Guantanamo Bay who
have returned home to Algeria are being prosecuted in Algeria.
That attorney also informed Petitioner’s counsel that she has not
located Mr. Ahmed’s attorney in Algeria. Finally, Petitioner’s
counsel also represents that extensive efforts have been made to
contact Mr. Ahmed’s family, but that those efforts have not yet
been successful.
Upon consideration of the counsel’s status report and
because the Court shares the Department of State’s “overriding
concern ... [in] ensuring that the receiving government is in
compliance with its assurances of humane treatment and that the
transferred detainee is, in fact, not being subjected to
mistreatment[,]” see Declaration of Clint Williamson dated
December 15, 2008, it is hereby
ORDERED that the government shall take all available and
appropriate steps to locate Mr. Ahmed and ascertain his status
and well-being and file a report by no later than 12:00 p.m. on
February 9, 2009, detailing (1) what steps have been taken to
comply with this Order and (2) Mr. Ahmed’s current status and
2 well-being.
SO ORDERED.
SIGNED: Emmet G. Sullivan United States District Judge February 3, 2009
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Ahmed v. Bush, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ahmed-v-bush-dcd-2009.