Ahmed v. Ashcroft

97 F. App'x 196
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided May 18, 2004·No. No. 02-72865·Published

Opinion

MEMORANDUM ***

Bashir Ahmed, a native and citizen of Bangladesh, petitions for review of the [197] Board of Immigration Appeals’ dismissal of his appeal of an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) denial of his application for asylum and withholding of removal. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial evidence, Singh v. INS, 340 F.3d 802, 806 (9th Cir.2003), and deny the petition for review.

Substantial evidence supports the IJ’s finding that Ahmed did not suffer past persecution or have a well-founded fear of future persecution. See INS v. Elias-Zacarias, 502 U.S. 478, 481, 112 S.Ct. 812, 117 L.Ed.2d 38 (1992); Gonzalez-Hernandez v. Ashcroft, 336 F.3d 995, 1000 (9th Cir.2003).

By failing to qualify for asylum, Ahmed necessarily fails to satisfy the more stringent standard for withholding of removal. See Alvarez Santos v. INS, 332 F.3d 1245, 1255 (9th Cir.2003).

DENIED.

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ahmed v. Ashcroft, 97 F. App'x 196 (9th Cir. 2004).

97 F. App'x 196 (Ahmed v. Ashcroft) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related