Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/Ahmed v. Ahmed

Ahmed v. Ahmed

88 A.D.3d 629, 930 N.Y.2d 472
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedOctober 4, 2011
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 88 A.D.3d 629 (Ahmed v. Ahmed) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ahmed v. Ahmed, 88 A.D.3d 629, 930 N.Y.2d 472 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2011).

Opinion

Under the circumstances of this case, the Supreme Court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in denying that branch of the plaintiff’s motion which was for an award of interim counsel fees (see Domestic Relations Law § 237 [a]; DeCabrera v Cabrera-Rosete, 70 NY2d 879 [1987]; Gruppuso v Caridi, 66 AD3d 838 [2009]; Prichep v Prichep, 52 AD3d 61 [2008]). Prudenti, EJ., Rivera, Austin and Roman, JJ, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Kaminash v. Levi
102 A.D.3d 837 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2013)
Shroba v. Shroba
89 A.D.3d 1079 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
88 A.D.3d 629, 930 N.Y.2d 472, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ahmed-v-ahmed-nyappdiv-2011.