Ahmed Hassan-Ahmed v. Kristi Noem, et al.
This text of Ahmed Hassan-Ahmed v. Kristi Noem, et al. (Ahmed Hassan-Ahmed v. Kristi Noem, et al.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, S.D. Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Southern District of Texas ENTERED UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT wenaly □□ ee SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION
AHMED HASSAN-AHMED, § § Petitioner, § § VS. § CIVIL ACTION NO. 4:25-CV-02985 § KRISTI NOEM, et ai., § § Respondents. § ORDER OF DISMISSAL
The petitioner, Ahmed Hassan-Ahmed, filed this petition to challenge his ongoing immigration custody. The parties advise the Court that the petitioner was removed from the United States on December 3, 2025. See Doc. No. 17. Because the petitioner is no longer in custody and no controversy remains, his petition must be dismissed as moot. See Spencer v. Kemna, 118 S. Ct. 978, 983 (1998) (holding that a case becomes moot if it “no longer present[s] a case or controversy under Article III, § 2 of the Constitution” because “[t]he parties must continue to have a ‘personal stake in the outcome’ of the lawsuit’”) (quoting Lewis v. Cont’l Bank Corp., 110 S. Ct. 1249, 1254 (1990)).
1/2
Therefore, the Court ORDERS that this habeas petition is DISMISSED without prejudice as MOOT. The Clerk will enter this Order, providing a correct copy to all parties of record. SIGNED onthis day of January 2026.
ANDREW S. HANEN UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
2/2
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Ahmed Hassan-Ahmed v. Kristi Noem, et al., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ahmed-hassan-ahmed-v-kristi-noem-et-al-txsd-2026.