Ahmadi v. Greater New York Councils, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Ahmadi v. Greater New York Councils, Inc.

283 A.D.2d 242, 724 N.Y.S.2d 408, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5096

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 15, 2001

StatusPublished

This text of 283 A.D.2d 242 (Ahmadi v. Greater New York Councils, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ahmadi v. Greater New York Councils, Inc., 283 A.D.2d 242, 724 N.Y.S.2d 408, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5096 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2001).

Pincite

Opinion

—Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Alan Saks, J.), entered on or about January 24, 2000, which, in an action by a teacher for personal injuries sustained when he was pushed by a student during an overnight camping trip, insofar as appealed from, granted defendant-respondent campground owner’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint as against it, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Defendant had no common-law duty to provide additional supervision for the student group using the campground for its outing, relative either to the duty of landowners owed to children on their property (see, Matson v Town of Milton, 252 AD2d 919, 921), or to the duty to secure their property against crime (see, Gill v New York City Hous. Auth., 130 AD2d 256, 259-260). Nor can such a duty be found in either the agreement signed by the participating teachers or any prior acts of defendant. Concur — Williams, J. P., Tom, Wallach, Buckley and Friedman, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Alan Saks, J.), entered on or about January 24, 2000, which, in an action by a teacher for personal injuries sustained when he was pushed by a student during an overnight camping trip, insofar as appealed from, granted defendant-respondent campground owner’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint as against it, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Defendant had no common-law duty to provide additional supervision for the student group using the campground for its outing, relative either to the duty of landowners owed to children on their property (see, Matson v Town of Milton, 252 AD2d 919, 921), or to the duty to secure their property against crime (see, Gill v New York City Hous. Auth., 130 AD2d 256, 259-260). Nor can such a duty be found in either the agreement signed by the participating teachers or any prior acts of defendant. Concur — Williams, J. P., Tom, Wallach, Buckley and Friedman, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

283 A.D.2d 242, 724 N.Y.S.2d 408, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5096, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ahmadi-v-greater-new-york-councils-inc-nyappdiv-2001.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack