Ahmad Rasheed v. State
This text of Ahmad Rasheed v. State (Ahmad Rasheed v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NUMBER 13-08-00727-CV
COURT OF APPEALS
THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG ____________________________________________________________
IN RE JUAN ANGEL GUERRA, DISTRICT AND COUNTY ATTORNEY FOR WILLACY COUNTY, STATE OF TEXAS ____________________________________________________________
On Motion for Stay of Execution of Order of the 197th District Court ____________________________________________________________
MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Yañez and Benavides Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam
Juan Angel Guerra, District and County Attorney for Willacy County, State of Texas,
has filed a motion for stay of execution of order of the 197th District Court. In the motion,
Guerra requests that this Court stay an order signed on December 10, 2008, by the
Honorable J. Manuel Bañales. Guerra asserts that this stay should “last until this Court of
[A]ppeals reviews the petition for original proceedings in this court, requesting injunctive
and mandamus relief.” As an initial matter, we note that Guerra has not filed an original proceeding
stemming from the disputed order. An original proceeding must be commenced before an
appellate court can grant temporary relief under Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 52.10.
In re Ramirez, 133 S.W.3d 664, 664-665 (Tex. App.–Corpus Christi 2003, orig.
proceeding); In re Kelleher, 999 S.W.2d 51, 52 (Tex. App.–Amarillo 1999, orig.
proceeding); see TEX . R. APP. P. 52.1, 52.10. Until an appropriate petition is filed, there
is no dispute before this Court. See In re Kelleher, 999 S.W.2d at 52.
Because Guerra has not filed a petition for writ of mandamus, we conclude we have
no jurisdiction to consider the emergency motion. Accordingly, this matter is DISMISSED
FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION without prejudice to Guerra’s right to reassert the motion
after commencing a proceeding pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 52.1.
PER CURIAM
Memorandum Opinion delivered and filed this 29th day of December, 2008.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Ahmad Rasheed v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ahmad-rasheed-v-state-texapp-2008.