Ahmad Lewis v. Martin J. O Malley

C.D. California

Ahmad Lewis v. Martin J. O Malley

District Court, C.D. California·Decided February 20, 2025·No. 5:24-cv-00492·Unknown

Opinion

AHMAD L., an Individual, Case No. 5:24-00492 AH (ADS)

Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION FOR v. AWARD AND PAYMENT OF ATTORNEY FEES AND EXPENSES PURSUANT TO THE MARTIN O’MALLEY, Commissioner of EQUAL ACCESS TO JUSTICE ACT, 28 Social Security,1 U.S.C., 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d) (DKT. NO. 24) Defendant. Before the Court is the parties’ Stipulation for The Award And Payment Of Attorney Fees And Expenses Pursuant To The Equal Access To Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d) (the “Stipulation”) (Dkt. No. 24). The Stipulation is timely and supported by sufficient and appropriately authenticated evidence to justify the fee award requested. See 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d)(1)(B) (requiring an “itemized statement” to show “actual time

1 Leland Dudek became Acting Commissioner of Social Security on February 19, 2025. Under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 25(d), he is automatically substituted for Martin O’Malley as Defendant in this suit. expended”); Carvajal v. U.S., 521 F.3d 1242, 1249 (9th Cir. 2008) (party seeking EAJA fees must show requested attorney fees are reasonable) (citing § 2412(d)(4)(A)—(B)). The Stipulation is GRANTED. Dated: FEBRUARY 20, 2025 ° fant ery THE HONORABLE ANNE HWANG United States District Judge

9 Presented by: _____/s/ Autumn D. Spaeth _ THE HONORABLE AUTUMN D. SPAETH United States Magistrate Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

AHMAD L., an Individual, Case No. 5:24-00492 AH (ADS)

Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION FOR v. AWARD AND PAYMENT OF ATTORNEY FEES AND EXPENSES PURSUANT TO THE MARTIN O’MALLEY, Commissioner of EQUAL ACCESS TO JUSTICE ACT, 28 Social Security,1 U.S.C., 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d) (DKT. NO. 24) Defendant. Before the Court is the parties’ Stipulation for The Award And Payment Of Attorney Fees And Expenses Pursuant To The Equal Access To Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d) (the “Stipulation”) (Dkt. No. 24). The Stipulation is timely and supported by sufficient and appropriately authenticated evidence to justify the fee award requested. See 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d)(1)(B) (requiring an “itemized statement” to show “actual time

1 Leland Dudek became Acting Commissioner of Social Security on February 19, 2025. Under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 25(d), he is automatically substituted for Martin O’Malley as Defendant in this suit. expended”); Carvajal v. U.S., 521 F.3d 1242, 1249 (9th Cir. 2008) (party seeking EAJA fees must show requested attorney fees are reasonable) (citing § 2412(d)(4)(A)—(B)). The Stipulation is GRANTED. Dated: FEBRUARY 20, 2025 ° fant ery THE HONORABLE ANNE HWANG United States District Judge

9 Presented by: _____/s/ Autumn D. Spaeth _ THE HONORABLE AUTUMN D. SPAETH United States Magistrate Judge

Ahmad Lewis v. Martin J. O Malley, (C.D. Cal. 2025).

Pincite

Ahmad Lewis v. Martin J. O Malley (Ahmad Lewis v. Martin J. O Malley) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related