Ahmad Fatemizadeh v. Sugar Creek Country Club

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided August 19, 2025·No. 01-24-00771-CV·Published

Opinion

Opinion issued August 19, 2025

In The

Court of Appeals For The

First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-24-00771-CV ——————————— AHMAD FATEMIZADEH, Appellant V. SUGAR CREEK COUNTRY CLUB, Appellee

On Appeal from the 268th District Court Fort Bend County, Texas Trial Court Case No. 23-DCV-311210

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant Ahmad Fatemizadeh has filed a motion to dismiss his appeal

because the parties have reached a settlement. In his certificate of conference,

appellant’s counsel stated that he attempted to reach opposing counsel concerning

the motion to dismiss, but he was unable to reach him. Therefore, the Court held this motion for 10 days to permit the filing of any opposition or response. See TEX.

R. APP. P. 10.3(a). No response was received.

We grant the motion and dismiss the appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(1),

43.2(f). Any pending motions are dismissed as moot.

PER CURIAM Panel consists of Justices Guerra, Gunn, and Dokupil.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ahmad Fatemizadeh v. Sugar Creek Country Club, (Tex. Ct. App. 2025).

Ahmad Fatemizadeh v. Sugar Creek Country Club (Ahmad Fatemizadeh v. Sugar Creek Country Club) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.