Ahmad Fatemizadeh v. Sugar Creek Country Club
This text of Ahmad Fatemizadeh v. Sugar Creek Country Club (Ahmad Fatemizadeh v. Sugar Creek Country Club) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Opinion issued August 19, 2025
In The
Court of Appeals For The
First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-24-00771-CV ——————————— AHMAD FATEMIZADEH, Appellant V. SUGAR CREEK COUNTRY CLUB, Appellee
On Appeal from the 268th District Court Fort Bend County, Texas Trial Court Case No. 23-DCV-311210
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Appellant Ahmad Fatemizadeh has filed a motion to dismiss his appeal
because the parties have reached a settlement. In his certificate of conference,
appellant’s counsel stated that he attempted to reach opposing counsel concerning
the motion to dismiss, but he was unable to reach him. Therefore, the Court held this motion for 10 days to permit the filing of any opposition or response. See TEX.
R. APP. P. 10.3(a). No response was received.
We grant the motion and dismiss the appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(1),
43.2(f). Any pending motions are dismissed as moot.
PER CURIAM Panel consists of Justices Guerra, Gunn, and Dokupil.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Ahmad Fatemizadeh v. Sugar Creek Country Club, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ahmad-fatemizadeh-v-sugar-creek-country-club-texapp-2025.