Ahlum v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

United States Court of Federal Claims·Decided February 26, 2020·No. 12-763·Unpublished

Opinion

In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS No. 12-763V Filed: January 27, 2020

DOUG AHLUM and KARI AHLUM, Parents and Next of Kin to T.A., Special Master Horner

Petitioners, Damages Decision Based on Proffer;

v. Table Injury; Measles Mumps Rubella Vaccine; Thrombocytopenic SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND Purpura; Systemic Inflammatory HUMAN SERVICES, Response Syndrome; SIRS;

Amputation; Shock; Multiorgan Respondent. Dysfunction Syndrome

Andrew Downing, Esq. Van Cott & Talamante, PLLC Phoenix, AZ, for petitioner. Debra Begley, US Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent.

DECISION AWARDING DAMAGES 1

On November 9, 2012, petitioners filed this petition for compensation on behalf of their minor son, T.A., under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq., 2 (the “Vaccine Act”). Petitioners alleged that the measles 1 I intend to post this decision on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website. This means the decision will be available to anyone with access to the internet. In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, I agree that the identified material fits within this definition, I will redact such material from public access. Because this unpublished decision contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, I am required to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website in accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government Services). 2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for ease of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 300aa (2012).

mumps rubella (MMR) vaccine caused a Table encephalopathic event, resulting in permanent injuries including the amputation of both of his legs. (ECF No. 1.) The case was assigned to Special master Laura Millman. On May 13, 2014, petitioner filed an amended petition, alleging a Table injury of encephalopathy and a Table injury of thrombocytopenic purpura leading to systemic inflammatory response syndrome (“SIRS”). (ECF No. 33.) On August 16, 2018, Special Master Millman issued a decision on entitlement in this case, finding that petitioner is entitled to compensation for his SIRS, shock, multiorgan dysfunction syndrome, and bilateral amputation of his legs. (ECF No 117.)

On January 24, 2020, respondent filed a proffer on award of compensation (“Proffer”) indicating petitioner should be awarded: a lump sum payment of $319,976.01 representing compensation for pain and suffering ($250,000.00) and life care expenses for Year One ($69,976.01); a lump sum payment of $15,551.47, representing compensation for past unreimbursable expenses; a lump sum payment of $311,507.41, representing compensation for satisfaction of a State of Arkansas Medicaid lien; and an amount sufficient to purchase the annuity contract as described in the Proffer. (Proffer at 3-4.) In the Proffer, respondent represented that petitioners agree with the proffered award. Id. Based on the record as a whole, I find that petitioners are entitled to an award as stated in the Proffer.

Accordingly, pursuant to the terms stated in the attached Proffer and accompanying Appendix, I award:

• A lump sum payment of $319,976.01, representing compensation for pain and suffering ($250,000.00) and life care expenses for Year One ($69,976.01), in the form of a check payable to petitioners as guardian(s)/conservator(s) of T.A., for the benefit of T.A.

• A lump sum payment of $15,551.47, representing compensation for past unreimbursable expenses, in the form of a check payable to petitioners, Doug Ahlum and Kari Ahlum.

• A lump sum payment of $311,507.41, representing compensation for satisfaction of a State of Arkansas Medicaid lien, payable jointly to petitioners and Arkansas Medicaid, and mailed to:

Arkansas Department of Human Services Division of Medical Services ATTN: Third Party Liability Unit P.O. Box 1437, Slot S-532 Little Rock, Arkansas 72203-1437 Case #: 149178 Claim#: 12-763-V Tax ID# XX-XXXXXXX • An amount sufficient to purchase the annuity contract described in the attached Proffer at Section II. D.

These amounts represent compensation for all damages that would be available under §15(a).

The clerk of the court is directed to enter judgment in accordance with this decision. 3

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/Daniel T. Horner Daniel T. Horner Special Master

3 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment can be expedited by the parties’ joint filing of notice renouncing the right to seek review.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

************************************* DOUG AHLUM and KARI AHLUM, * parents and next of kin to T.A., *

*

Petitioners, * No. 12-763V * Special Master Horner v. *

*

SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND * HUMAN SERVICES, *

*

Respondent. * *************************************

RESPONDENT'S PROFFER ON AWARD OF COMPENSATION

In her Ruling on Entitlement issued on August 16, 2018, Special Master Millman found that

a preponderance of the evidence supported petitioners’ claim that a measles, mumps, rubella (MMR)

vaccine administered to T.A. on August 11, 2011, caused him to develop a systemic inflammatory

reaction syndrome (SIRS), that led to subsequent shock, multi-organ dysfunction syndrome, and

bilateral amputation of his legs. Respondent now proffers the following regarding the amount of

compensation to be awarded.1

I. Items of Compensation

A. Life Care Items

The respondent engaged life care planner, Linda Curtis, RN, MS, CCM, CLCP, and

petitioners engaged Roberta Hurley, BS. Ed., to provide an estimation of T.A.’s future vaccine-

injury related needs. For the purposes of this proffer, the term “vaccine related” is as described

1 The parties have no objection to the amount of the proffered award of damages. Assuming the Special Master issues a damages decision in conformity with this proffer, the parties waive their right to seek review of such damages decision. However, respondent reserves his right, pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-12(e), to seek review of the Special Master’s August 16, 2018, Ruling on Entitlement.

in the Special Master’s Ruling on Entitlement. All items of compensation identified in the life

care plan are supported by the evidence, and are illustrated by the attached chart entitled

“Appendix A: Items of Compensation for T.A.”2 Petitioners agree.

B. Lost Future Earnings

The parties agree that based upon the evidence of record, T.A. will more likely than not

be gainfully employed in the future. Therefore, respondent proffers that T.A. should not be

awarded lost future earnings as provided under the Vaccine Act, 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a)(3)(B).

Petitioners agree.

C. Pain and Suffering

Respondent proffers that T.A. should be awarded $250,000.00 in actual pain and

suffering. See 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a)(4). Petitioners agree.

D. Past Unreimbursable Expenses

Evidence supplied by petitioners documents their expenditure of past unreimbursable

expenses related to T.A.'s vaccine-related injury. Respondent proffers that petitioners should be

awarded past unreimbursable expenses in the amount of $15,551.47. Petitioners agree.

E. Medicaid Lien

Respondent proffers that T.A. should be awarded funds to satisfy a State of Arkansas

Medicaid lien in the amount of $311,507.41, which represents full satisfaction of any right of

subrogation, assignment, claim, lien, or cause of action the State of Arkansas may have against

any individual as a result of any Medicaid payments the Arkansas Medicaid Program has made

to or on behalf of T.A. from the date of his eligibility for benefits through the date of judgment in

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ahlum v. Secretary of Health and Human Services, (uscfc 2020).

Ahlum v. Secretary of Health and Human Services (Ahlum v. Secretary of Health and Human Services) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

§ 300aa
42 U.S.C. § 300aa
§ 300aa-10
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-10
§ 300aa-12
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-12(e)
§ 300aa-15
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a)(3)(B)
Purposes
44 U.S.C. § 3501
§ 300a
42 U.S.C. § 300a