Ahlquist v. Village of Mora

259 N.W. 692, 194 Minn. 112, 1935 Minn. LEXIS 943
Supreme Court of Minnesota·Decided March 22, 1935·No. No. 30,289.·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The decisions in the cases of Morgan v. Village of Mountain Lake, 194 Minn. 104, 259 N. W. 689, and Interstate Power Co. v. Fairbanks, Morse & Co. 194 Minn. 110, 259 N. W. 691, opinions in which are filed herewith, are controlling of the issues raised by this appeal with respect of claimed violations of provisions of the corrupt practices act.

As to alleged violations of the general election laws, the court’s findings—that the election was duly, legally, and properly called and held and duly and legally conducted and that the result of said election was a free, full, and fair expression of the will of the voters *113 without fraud, duress, or undue influence—are sufficiently supported by the evidence.

Affirmed.

Stone, Justice, took no part.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ahlquist v. Village of Mora, 259 N.W. 692, 194 Minn. 112, 1935 Minn. LEXIS 943 (Mich. 1935).

259 N.W. 692 (Ahlquist v. Village of Mora) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ahlquist v. Commonwealth Electric Co.
261 N.W. 452 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1935)