Ahl v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Ahl v. State

4 S.E.2d 692, 60 Ga. App. 629, 1939 Ga. App. LEXIS 117

Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided September 22, 1939·No. 27662·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

MacIntyre, J.

1. Where no ruling of the court was invoked and none given on a question that should have been raised in the trial court, the question can not be raised for the first time in the Court of Appeals. May v. Lee, 57 Ga. App. 893 (197 S. E. 50).

[630] Decided September 22, 1939. I. J. Bussell, for plaintiffs in error. Jcup H. Highsmiih, solicitor, contra.

2. The evidence amply authorized the finding that the defendants were guilty of fishing on the property of another “after having been ordered to desist therefrom.” The judge did not err in overruling the motion for new trial based only on the general grounds.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, O. J., and Guerry, J., oonewr.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

MacIntyre, J.

1. Where no ruling of the court was invoked and none given on a question that should have been raised in the trial court, the question can not be raised for the first time in the Court of Appeals. May v. Lee, 57 Ga. App. 893 (197 S. E. 50).

[630] Decided September 22, 1939. I. J. Bussell, for plaintiffs in error. Jcup H. Highsmiih, solicitor, contra.

2. The evidence amply authorized the finding that the defendants were guilty of fishing on the property of another “after having been ordered to desist therefrom.” The judge did not err in overruling the motion for new trial based only on the general grounds.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, O. J., and Guerry, J., oonewr.

Ahl v. State, 4 S.E.2d 692, 60 Ga. App. 629, 1939 Ga. App. LEXIS 117 (Ga. Ct. App. 1939).

Pincite

4 S.E.2d 692 (Ahl v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related