Ahl v. Commonwealth Land Title Insurance

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Ahl v. Commonwealth Land Title Insurance

302 A.D.2d 948, 755 N.Y.S.2d 149, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 929

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 7, 2003

StatusPublished

This text of 302 A.D.2d 948 (Ahl v. Commonwealth Land Title Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ahl v. Commonwealth Land Title Insurance, 302 A.D.2d 948, 755 N.Y.S.2d 149, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 929 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2003).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from an order of Supreme Court, Monroe County (Siracuse, J.), entered May 7, 2002, which denied plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment and granted defendant’s cross motion seeking summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed without costs.

Memorandum: Supreme Court properly denied plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment and granted defendant’s cross motion seeking summary judgment dismissing the complaint. Plaintiff’s title insurance policy with defendant specifically excluded the disputed encroaching parcel. Consequently, defendant has no duty to indemnify plaintiff in the underlying action commenced by plaintiff against his neighbor (see McNichol Enters. v First Fin. Ins. Co., 284 AD2d 964, 965). Present — Pigott, Jr., P.J., Green, Scudder, Gorski and Lawton, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from an order of Supreme Court, Monroe County (Siracuse, J.), entered May 7, 2002, which denied plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment and granted defendant’s cross motion seeking summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed without costs.

Memorandum: Supreme Court properly denied plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment and granted defendant’s cross motion seeking summary judgment dismissing the complaint. Plaintiff’s title insurance policy with defendant specifically excluded the disputed encroaching parcel. Consequently, defendant has no duty to indemnify plaintiff in the underlying action commenced by plaintiff against his neighbor (see McNichol Enters. v First Fin. Ins. Co., 284 AD2d 964, 965). Present — Pigott, Jr., P.J., Green, Scudder, Gorski and Lawton, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

302 A.D.2d 948, 755 N.Y.S.2d 149, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 929, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ahl-v-commonwealth-land-title-insurance-nyappdiv-2003.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack