Ahituv v. Ahituv

3 A.D.3d 531, 770 N.Y.S.2d 636
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJanuary 20, 2004
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 3 A.D.3d 531 (Ahituv v. Ahituv) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ahituv v. Ahituv, 3 A.D.3d 531, 770 N.Y.S.2d 636 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2004).

Opinion

In a family offense proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 8, the wife appeals from an order of the Family Court, Nassau County (Foskey, J.), dated February 7, 2003, which, after a hearing, found that she violated an order of protection previously issued by the court on June 10, 2002, and directed her incarceration for a period of 15 days. By decision and order on motion of this Court dated February 24, 2003, enforcement of the order was stayed pending hearing and determination of the appeal.

Ordered that the order is modified by reducing the wife’s sentence to the time she has already spent incarcerated; as so modified, the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

Under the particular circumstances of this case, no further incarceration is warranted.

The wife’s remaining contentions are without merit. Ritter, J.P., Florio, Smith and H. Miller, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

MatterofStuartLL.vAimeeKK.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014
Stuart LL. v. Aimee KK.
123 A.D.3d 218 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
3 A.D.3d 531, 770 N.Y.S.2d 636, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ahituv-v-ahituv-nyappdiv-2004.