Ahern v. Lewis Café, Inc.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Ahern v. Lewis Café, Inc.

333 S.W.3d 535, 2011 WL 900123

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided March 15, 2011·No. No. ED 94997·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Matthew Ahearn (“Claimant”) appeals from the decision of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission (“the Commission”) disqualifying Claimant for unemployment benefits. Claimant asserts the Commission erred in finding he was disqualified because there was no substantial and competent evidence in the record to warrant disqualification based on misconduct.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal. We find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and [536] reasons for this order. The judgment of the motion court is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Matthew Ahearn (“Claimant”) appeals from the decision of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission (“the Commission”) disqualifying Claimant for unemployment benefits. Claimant asserts the Commission erred in finding he was disqualified because there was no substantial and competent evidence in the record to warrant disqualification based on misconduct.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal. We find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and [536] reasons for this order. The judgment of the motion court is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Ahern v. Lewis Café, Inc., 333 S.W.3d 535, 2011 WL 900123 (Mo. Ct. App. 2011).

Pincite

333 S.W.3d 535 (Ahern v. Lewis Café, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.