Ahbol v. Harden Contracting Co.

241 A.D. 824
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Ahbol v. Harden Contracting Co.. Read the opinion of the Court — 241 A.D. 764

Opinion

Motion for reargument denied, with ten dollars costs. This court did not overlook the respondent’s claim respecting the alleged violation by appellant of section 241 of the Labor Law. The ease was not tried on that theory. Besides, subdivision 4 of that section expressly excepts from its requirements spaces “ for stairways and elevator shafts designated by the plans and specifications.” Undisputed testimony was that the rivet was dropped and the accident occurred in a space under the tower which had been left open, under the plans, for permanent stairways. Present — Lazansky, P. J., Kapper, Carswell, Scudder and Tompkins, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ahbol v. Harden Contracting Co., 241 A.D. 824 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1934).

241 A.D. 824 (Ahbol v. Harden Contracting Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.