A.H. v. S.U.
497 S.W.3d 819, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 647
Opinion
Order
S.U. appeals the juvenile court’s judgment terminating his parental rights to his daughter, A.H. He contends the judgment was not supported by clear, cogent, and convincing evidence and was against the weight of the evidence. For reasons explained in a Memorandum provided to the parties, we find no error and affirm the judgment. Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
A.H. v. S.U., 497 S.W.3d 819, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 647 (Mo. Ct. App. 2016).
497 S.W.3d 819 (A.H. v. S.U.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.