Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/A.H. v. State

A.H. v. State

909 So. 2d 411, 2005 WL 1991630
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedAugust 19, 2005
DocketNo. 5D04-3361
StatusPublished

This text of 909 So. 2d 411 (A.H. v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
A.H. v. State, 909 So. 2d 411, 2005 WL 1991630 (Fla. Ct. App. 2005).

Opinion

ORFINGER, J.

A.H. appeals a disposition order entered after he admitted violating his probation. He contends that his plea was involuntary, although he admits never having sought to withdraw it. The proper method for a juvenile to challenge the voluntariness of his plea is by petition for writ of habeas corpus in the circuit court. See J.M.B. v. State, 750 So.2d 654, 654-55 (Fla. 2d DCA 1999); In Interest of W.B., 428 So.2d 309, 312 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983). Accordingly, we affirm without prejudice to AH.’s filing such a petition, if he desires. We find no merit in the other issue A.H. raised.

AFFIRMED.

PLEUS, C.J. and MONACO, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In Interest of WB
428 So. 2d 309 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1983)
J.M.B. v. State
750 So. 2d 654 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1999)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
909 So. 2d 411, 2005 WL 1991630, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ah-v-state-fladistctapp-2005.