A.H. v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

A.H. v. State

909 So. 2d 411, 2005 WL 1991630

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in A.H. v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 8317 →

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 19, 2005·No. No. 5D04-3361·Published

Opinion

ORFINGER, J.

A.H. appeals a disposition order entered after he admitted violating his probation. He contends that his plea was involuntary, although he admits never having sought to withdraw it. The proper method for a juvenile to challenge the voluntariness of his plea is by petition for writ of habeas corpus in the circuit court. See J.M.B. v. State, 750 So.2d 654, 654-55 (Fla. 2d DCA 1999); In Interest of W.B., 428 So.2d 309, 312 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983). Accordingly, we affirm without prejudice to AH.’s filing such a petition, if he desires. We find no merit in the other issue A.H. raised.

AFFIRMED.

PLEUS, C.J. and MONACO, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORFINGER, J.

A.H. appeals a disposition order entered after he admitted violating his probation. He contends that his plea was involuntary, although he admits never having sought to withdraw it. The proper method for a juvenile to challenge the voluntariness of his plea is by petition for writ of habeas corpus in the circuit court. See J.M.B. v. State, 750 So.2d 654, 654-55 (Fla. 2d DCA 1999); In Interest of W.B., 428 So.2d 309, 312 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983). Accordingly, we affirm without prejudice to AH.’s filing such a petition, if he desires. We find no merit in the other issue A.H. raised.

AFFIRMED.

PLEUS, C.J. and MONACO, J., concur.

A.H. v. State, 909 So. 2d 411, 2005 WL 1991630 (Fla. Ct. App. 2005).

Pincite

909 So. 2d 411 (A.H. v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related