A.H. v. Sacramento County Dept. Child, Family and Adult Services

District Court, E.D. California·Decided March 18, 2022·No. 2:21-cv-00690·Unknown

Opinion

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FILED

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT MAR 17 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS In re: A.H., a minor; et al. No. 22-70019

______________________________ D.C. No. 2:21-cv-00690-KJM-JDP A.H., a minor; et al., Eastern District of California, Sacramento Petitioners, ORDER v.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SACRAMENTO,

Respondent,

ELK GROVE UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT; et al.,

Real Parties in Interest.

Before: TASHIMA, FRIEDLAND, and BADE, Circuit Judges.

Petitioners have not demonstrated that this case warrants the intervention of this court by means of the extraordinary remedy of mandamus. See Bauman v. U.S. Dist. Court, 557 F.2d 650 (9th Cir. 1977). Accordingly, the petition is denied. DENIED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

A.H. v. Sacramento County Dept. Child, Family and Adult Services, (E.D. Cal. 2022).

A.H. v. Sacramento County Dept. Child, Family and Adult Services (A.H. v. Sacramento County Dept. Child, Family and Adult Services) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related