A.H. v. Sacramento County Dept. Child, Family and Adult Services
This text of A.H. v. Sacramento County Dept. Child, Family and Adult Services (A.H. v. Sacramento County Dept. Child, Family and Adult Services) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, E.D. California primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FILED
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT MAR 17 2022
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS In re: A.H., a minor; et al. No. 22-70019
______________________________ D.C. No. 2:21-cv-00690-KJM-JDP A.H., a minor; et al., Eastern District of California, Sacramento Petitioners, ORDER v.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SACRAMENTO,
Respondent,
ELK GROVE UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT; et al.,
Real Parties in Interest.
Before: TASHIMA, FRIEDLAND, and BADE, Circuit Judges.
Petitioners have not demonstrated that this case warrants the intervention of this court by means of the extraordinary remedy of mandamus. See Bauman v. U.S. Dist. Court, 557 F.2d 650 (9th Cir. 1977). Accordingly, the petition is denied. DENIED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
A.H. v. Sacramento County Dept. Child, Family and Adult Services, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ah-v-sacramento-county-dept-child-family-and-adult-services-caed-2022.