A.H. v. County of Los Angeles

CourtDistrict Court, C.D. California
DecidedOctober 13, 2022
Docket2:22-cv-03671
StatusUnknown

This text of A.H. v. County of Los Angeles (A.H. v. County of Los Angeles) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, C.D. California primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
A.H. v. County of Los Angeles, (C.D. Cal. 2022).

Opinion

Case 2:22-cv-03671-SB-AS Document 50 Filed 10/13/22 Page 1 of 15 Page ID #:389

1 JILL WILLIAMS – State Bar No. 221793 CARPENTER, ROTHANS & DUMONT 2 500 South Grand Avenue, 19th Floor Los Angeles, California 90071 3 (213) 228-0400 / (213) 228-0401 (Fax) jwilliams@crdlaw.com 4 Attorney for Defendant 5 County of Los Angeles 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

11 A.H, a minor, individually and as ) Case No. 2:22−cv−03671−SB-ASx successor in interest to decedent, ) 12 Richard Hayes, by and through his ) Guardian ad Litem, Tiffany Hayes; ) STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER 13 S.H., a minor, individually and as ) (AMENDED) successor in interest to decedent, ) 14 Richard Hayes, by and through her ) Guardian ad Litem, Tiffany Hayes; ) [DISCOVERY DOCUMENT; 15 and TIFFANY HAYES, individually, ) REFERRED TO MAGISTRATE ) JUDGE] 16 Plaintiffs, ) v. ) 17 ) COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES; and ) 18 DOES 1-10, inclusive, ) ) 19 Defendants. ) ) 20 ) ) 21 ) ) 22 23 IT IS SO STIPULATED BY AND BETWEEN Plaintiffs TIFFANY 24 HAYES; A.H. and S.H., by and through their guardian ad litem, and Defendant 25 COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, by and through their respective counsel, as 26 follows: 27 1. A. PURPOSES AND LIMITATIONS 28 Discovery in this action is likely to involve production of confidential, - 1 - STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER (AMENDED) Case 2:22-cv-03671-SB-AS Document 50 Filed 10/13/22 Page 2 of 15 Page ID #:390

1 proprietary, or private information for which special protection from public 2 disclosure and from use for any purpose other than prosecuting this litigation may 3 be warranted. Accordingly, the parties hereby stipulate to and petition the Court to 4 enter the following Stipulated Protective Order. The parties acknowledge that this 5 Order does not confer blanket protections on all disclosures or responses to 6 discovery and that the protection it affords from public disclosure and use extends 7 only to the limited information or items that are entitled to confidential treatment 8 under the applicable legal principles. The parties further acknowledge, as set forth 9 in Section 12.3, below, that this Stipulated Protective Order does not entitle them 10 to file confidential information under seal; Civil Local Rule 79-5 sets forth the 11 procedures that must be followed and the standards that will be applied when a 12 party seeks permission from the court to file material under seal. 13 B. GOOD CAUSE STATEMENT 14 This action is likely to involve proprietary and confidential information for 15 which special protection from public disclosure and from use for any purpose other 16 than prosecution of this action is warranted. Such confidential and proprietary 17 materials and information consist of, among other things, confidential business or 18 financial information, information regarding confidential business practices, or 19 other confidential research, development, or commercial information (including 20 information implicating privacy rights of third parties), information otherwise 21 generally unavailable to the public, or which may be privileged or otherwise 22 protected from disclosure under state or federal statutes, court rules, case decisions, 23 or common law. Accordingly, to expedite the flow of information, to facilitate the 24 prompt resolution of disputes over confidentiality of discovery materials, to 25 adequately protect information the parties are entitled to keep confidential, to 26 ensure that the parties are permitted reasonably necessary uses of such material in 27 preparation for and in the conduct of trial, to address their handling at the end of 28 the litigation, and serve the ends of justice, a protective order for such information - 2 - STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER (AMENDED) Case 2:22-cv-03671-SB-AS Document 50 Filed 10/13/22 Page 3 of 15 Page ID #:391

1 is justified in this matter. It is the intent of the parties that information will not be 2 designated as confidential for tactical reasons and that nothing be so designated 3 without a good faith belief that it has been maintained in a confidential, non-public 4 manner, and there is good cause why it should not be part of the public record of 5 this case. 6 2. DEFINITIONS 7 2.1 Action: A.H., et al. v. County of Los Angeles, et al., 8 2:22−cv−03671−SB-ASx. 9 2.2 Challenging Party: A Party or Non-Party that challenges the 10 designation of information or items under this Order. 11 2.3 “CONFIDENTIAL” Information or Items: Information (regardless 12 of how it is generated, stored or maintained) or tangible things that a Designating 13 Party believes is entitled to confidential treatment under Federal Rule of Civil 14 Procedure 26(c), and as specified above in the Good Cause Statement. 15 This also includes (1) any information copied or extracted from the Confidential 16 information; (2) all copies, excerpts, summaries, abstracts or compilations of 17 Confidential information; and (3) any testimony, conversations, or presentations 18 that might reveal Confidential information. 19 2.4 Counsel: Outside Counsel of Record and House Counsel (as well as their 20 support staff). 21 2.5 Designating Party: A Party or Non-Party that designates information 22 or items that it produces in disclosures or in responses to discovery as 23 “CONFIDENTIAL.” 24 2.6 Disclosure or Discovery Material: All items or information, regardless 25 of the medium or manner in which it is generated, stored, or maintained (including, 26 among other things, testimony, transcripts, and tangible things), that are produced 27 or generated in disclosures or responses to discovery in this matter. 28 2.7 Expert: A person with specialized knowledge or experience in a matter - 3 - STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER (AMENDED) Case 2:22-cv-03671-SB-AS Document 50 Filed 10/13/22 Page 4 of 15 Page ID #:392

1 pertinent to the litigation who has been retained by a Party or its counsel to serve 2 as an expert witness or as a consultant in this Action. 3 2.8 House Counsel: Attorneys who are employees of a party to this Action. 4 House Counsel does not include Outside Counsel of Record or any other outside 5 counsel. 6 2.9 Non-Party: Any natural person, partnership, corporation association, or 7 other legal entity not named as a Party to this action. 8 2.10 Outside Counsel of Record: attorneys who are not employees of a party 9 to this Action but are retained to represent or advise a party to this Action and have 10 appeared in this Action on behalf of that party or are affiliated with a law firm 11 which has appeared on behalf of that party, and includes support staff. 12 2.11 Party: any party to this Action, including all of its officers, directors, 13 employees, consultants, retained experts, and Outside Counsel of Record (and their 14 support staffs). 15 2.12 Producing Party: a Party or Non-Party that produces Disclosure or 16 Discovery Material in this Action. 17 2.13 Professional Vendors: persons or entities that provide litigation support 18 services (e.g., photocopying, videotaping, translating, preparing exhibits or 19 demonstrations, and organizing, storing, or retrieving data in any form or medium) 20 and their employees and subcontractors. 21 2.14 Protected Material: any Disclosure or Discovery Material that is 22 designated as “CONFIDENTIAL.” 23 2.15 Receiving Party: a Party that receives Disclosure or Discovery Material 24 from a Producing Party. 25 3. SCOPE 26 The protections conferred by this Stipulation and Order cover not only 27 Protected Material (as defined above), but also (1) any information copied or 28 extracted from Protected Material; (2) all copies, excerpts, abstracts, summaries, or - 4 - STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER (AMENDED) Case 2:22-cv-03671-SB-AS Document 50 Filed 10/13/22 Page 5 of 15 Page ID #:393

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Kamakana v. City and County of Honolulu
447 F.3d 1172 (Ninth Circuit, 2006)
Agricultural Insurance v. Potts
26 A. 27 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1892)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
A.H. v. County of Los Angeles, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ah-v-county-of-los-angeles-cacd-2022.