Ah Sou v. United States

200 U.S. 611, 50 L. Ed. 619, 26 S. Ct. 752, 1905 U.S. LEXIS 970
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided December 18, 1905·No. No. 339·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Appeal from the -United States Circuit Court, of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.

Per Curiam.

Dismissed for the want of jurisdiction. 132 Fed. Rep, [612]*612878; 138 Fed. Rep. 775; Barry v. Mercein, 5 How. 103, 120; Kurtz v. Moffitt, 115 U. S. 487; Lau Ow Bew v. United States, 144 U. S. 47, 58; Western Union Telegraph Company v. Ann Arbor Railroad Company, 178 U. S. 239; Farrell v. O’Brien, 199 U. S. 89; Fong Yue Ting v. United States, 149 U. S. 698, 730; Chin Bak Kan v. United States, 186 U. S. 193; Tom Hong v. United States, 193 U. S. 517; Turner v. Williams, 194 U. S. 279.

Mr. John M. Thurston for appellant. The Attorney General and The Solicitor General for appellee.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ah Sou v. United States, 200 U.S. 611, 50 L. Ed. 619, 26 S. Ct. 752, 1905 U.S. LEXIS 970 (1905).

200 U.S. 611 (Ah Sou v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Yuen Pak Sune
183 F. 260 (N.D. New York, 1910)