Ah Sou v. United States

Supreme Court

Ah Sou v. United States

200 U.S. 611, 50 L. Ed. 619, 26 S. Ct. 752, 1905 U.S. LEXIS 970

CourtSupreme Court of the United States

DecidedDecember 18, 1905

DocketNo. 339

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 200 U.S. 611 (Ah Sou v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ah Sou v. United States, 200 U.S. 611, 50 L. Ed. 619, 26 S. Ct. 752, 1905 U.S. LEXIS 970 (1905).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from the -United States Circuit Court, of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.

Per Curiam.

Dismissed for the want of jurisdiction. 132 Fed. Rep, [612]*612878; 138 Fed. Rep. 775; Barry v. Mercein, 5 How. 103, 120; Kurtz v. Moffitt, 115 U. S. 487; Lau Ow Bew v. United States, 144 U. S. 47, 58; Western Union Telegraph Company v. Ann Arbor Railroad Company, 178 U. S. 239; Farrell v. O’Brien, 199 U. S. 89; Fong Yue Ting v. United States, 149 U. S. 698, 730; Chin Bak Kan v. United States, 186 U. S. 193; Tom Hong v. United States, 193 U. S. 517; Turner v. Williams, 194 U. S. 279.

Mr. John M. Thurston for appellant. The Attorney General and The Solicitor General for appellee.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from the -United States Circuit Court, of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.

Per Curiam.

Dismissed for the want of jurisdiction. 132 Fed. Rep, [612]*612878; 138 Fed. Rep. 775; Barry v. Mercein, 5 How. 103, 120; Kurtz v. Moffitt, 115 U. S. 487; Lau Ow Bew v. United States, 144 U. S. 47, 58; Western Union Telegraph Company v. Ann Arbor Railroad Company, 178 U. S. 239; Farrell v. O’Brien, 199 U. S. 89; Fong Yue Ting v. United States, 149 U. S. 698, 730; Chin Bak Kan v. United States, 186 U. S. 193; Tom Hong v. United States, 193 U. S. 517; Turner v. Williams, 194 U. S. 279.

Mr. John M. Thurston for appellant. The Attorney General and The Solicitor General for appellee.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

200 U.S. 611, 50 L. Ed. 619, 26 S. Ct. 752, 1905 U.S. LEXIS 970, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ah-sou-v-united-states-scotus-1905.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack