Ah Sing v. Nacino
This text of Ah Sing v. Nacino (Ah Sing v. Nacino) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Hawaii Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCPW-12-0000700 23-AUG-2012 01:06 PM
NO. SCPW-12-0000700
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI'I
CEDRIC AH SING, Petitioner,
vs.
THE HONORABLE EDWIN C. NACINO, JUDGE OF THE CIRCUIT
COURT OF THE FIRST CIRCUIT, STATE OF HAWAI'I, Respondent.
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING
(CIV. NO. 1CC12-1-000496; CR. NO. 56581)
ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS
(By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, Acoba, McKenna, and Pollack, JJ.)
Upon consideration of petitioner Cedric Ah Sing’s August
8, 2012 petition for a writ of mandamus, the papers in support and
the record, it appears that petitioner fails to demonstrate a
clear and indisputable right to relief and, therefore, is not
entitled to mandamus relief. See Kema v. Gaddis, 91 Hawai'i 200,
204, 982 P.2d 334, 338 (1999) (A writ of mandamus is an
extraordinary remedy that will not issue unless the petitioner
demonstrates a clear and indisputable right to relief and a lack
of alternative means to redress adequately the alleged wrong or
obtain the requested action). Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the clerk of the appellate
court shall process the petition for a writ of mandamus without
payment of the filing fee.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the petition for a writ of
mandamus is denied.
DATED: Honolulu, Hawai'i, August 23, 2012.
/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald
/s/ Paula A. Nakayama
/s/ Simeon R. Acoba, Jr.
/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna
/s/ Richard W. Pollack
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Ah Sing v. Nacino, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ah-sing-v-nacino-haw-2012.