AH ROBINS COMPANY, INC. v. Director, Division of Taxation

861 A.2d 131, 182 N.J. 77, 2004 N.J. LEXIS 1404
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided December 7, 2004·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed, substantially for the reasons expressed in Judge Stem’s opinion of the Appellate Division, reported at 365 N.J.Super. 472, 839 A.2d 914 (2004).

*78 For reversal and, remandment — Chief Justice PORITZ, Justices LONG, LaVECCHIA, ZAZZALI, ALBIN, WALLACE and RIVERA-SOTO — 7.

Opposed — None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

AH ROBINS COMPANY, INC. v. Director, Division of Taxation, 861 A.2d 131, 182 N.J. 77, 2004 N.J. LEXIS 1404 (N.J. 2004).

861 A.2d 131 (AH ROBINS COMPANY, INC. v. Director, Division of Taxation) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

OFP, LLC v. State
930 A.2d 442 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 2007)
Oberhand v. Director, Division of Taxation
22 N.J. Tax 55 (New Jersey Tax Court, 2005)
Estate of FK v. DMAHS
863 A.2d 1065 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 2005)
Savage-Keough v. Keough
861 A.2d 131 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 2004)