Ah Kle v. McLean
26 P. 937, 3 Idaho 70, 1891 Ida. LEXIS 17
Opinion
The transcript in this case fails to show that any judgment was ever entered, but merely an order for a judgment. Therefore the opinion in the case of Durant v. Comegys, ante, p. 67, 35 Am. St. Rep. 267, 26 Pac. 755 (decided at this term), applies to, and will govern, this case. Appeal dismissed without prejudice to another appeal; costs of appeal awarded to respondents.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Ah Kle v. McLean, 26 P. 937, 3 Idaho 70, 1891 Ida. LEXIS 17 (Idaho 1891).
26 P. 937 (Ah Kle v. McLean) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Brock v. Eubanks
288 S.W.3d 272 (Court of Appeals of Arkansas, 2008)
Morgan v. National Bank of Commerce of Shawnee
1923 OK 240 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1923)
Santti v. Hartman
161 P. 249 (Idaho Supreme Court, 1916)
Nichols v. Quinn
147 P. 1103 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1915)
CarlLee v. State
143 S.W. 909 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1912)
Bissing v. Bissing
115 P. 827 (Idaho Supreme Court, 1911)
York v. State
115 S.W. 948 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1909)
Boyd v. Steele
59 P. 21 (Idaho Supreme Court, 1899)
In re Harmer
27 P. 1004 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1891)