Agustin Garcia Garcia v. Gilldup III, LLC D/B/A Gillman Chevrolet of Harlingen and Joe Alvarez

• Court: Court of Appeals of Texas
• Decided: February 3, 2022
• Docket: 13-21-00273-CV
• Status: Published

Opinion

NUMBER 13-21-00273-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG

____________________________________________________________

AGUSTIN GARCIA GARCIA, Appellant,

v.

GILLDUP III, LLC D/B/A GILLMAN CHEVROLET OF HARLINGEN AND JOE ALVAREZ, Appellees. ____________________________________________________________

On appeal from the 444th District Court of Cameron County, Texas. ____________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Chief Justice Contreras and Justices Benavides and Longoria Memorandum Opinion by Justice Longoria

This matter is before the court on its own motion. On November 22, 2021, the Clerk

of the Court notified appellant that, pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure

38.8(a)(1), the appeal was subject to dismissal for want of prosecution unless, within ten days, appellant provided reasonable explanation for his failure to timely file a brief.

Appellant failed to respond to the notice and has not filed a brief.

Appellant has neither reasonably explained his failure to file a motion for extension

of time nor filed his brief. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution.

See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a), 42.3(b),(c).

NORA L. LONGORIA Justice

Delivered and filed on the 3rd day of February, 2022.