Agustin Calderon v. State

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedAugust 16, 2018
Docket01-18-00422-CR
StatusPublished

This text of Agustin Calderon v. State (Agustin Calderon v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Agustin Calderon v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2018).

Opinion

COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER

Appellate case name: Agustin Calderon v. The State of Texas

Appellate case number: 01-18-00422-CR

Trial court case number: 15CR3346

Trial court: 10th District Court of Galveston County

A jury convicted appellant, Agustin Calderon, of the offense of capital murder. The trial court assessed appellant’s punishment at confinement for life and certified that this is not a plea-bargain case and appellant has the right of appeal. Appellant timely filed a pro se notice of appeal. Appellant’s appointed trial counsel filed a motion to withdraw. On May 2, 2018, the trial court signed an order permitting counsel to withdraw and finding that appellant “is indigent, and is entitled to the appointment of counsel to represent [him] on appeal.” However, the record filed in this Court does not show that the trial court has appointed counsel to represent appellant on appeal. And, no attorney has appeared in this Court on appellant’s behalf. Based on the trial court’s finding that he is indigent, appellant is entitled to court-appointed appellate counsel. See TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. ANN. art. 1.051(d)(1), 26.04(p) (West Supp. 2017). Accordingly, we abate this appeal, remand the case to the trial court, and direct the trial court to appoint counsel, at no expense to appellant, to represent him on appeal. See id. art. 1.051(a), (c), (d)(1); 26.04(a), (b)(1), (c), (p). The trial court clerk is directed to file a supplemental clerk’s record containing the trial court’s order appointing counsel to represent appellant on appeal with this Court within 30 days of the date of this order. The appeal is abated, treated as a closed case, and removed from this Court’s active docket. The appeal will be reinstated on this Court’s active docket when a supplemental clerk’s record that complies with this order is filed in this Court. It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Russell Lloyd  Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: August 16, 2018

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Agustin Calderon v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/agustin-calderon-v-state-texapp-2018.