Agulnick v. Rauch

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Agulnick v. Rauch

159 N.Y.S. 787

CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

DecidedJune 26, 1916

StatusPublished

This text of 159 N.Y.S. 787 (Agulnick v. Rauch) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Agulnick v. Rauch, 159 N.Y.S. 787 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1916).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The notice of appeal herein states that the appeal is taken from an order bearing date the 2d day of February 1916. No such order appears in the record. There is an order in the record dated February 25, 1916, but as the notice of-appeal merely refers to an order by its date, and makes no mention of the contents or nature of the order, it is impossible to determine that the notice of appeal refers to the order dated February 25, 1916. The appeal must therefore be dismissed.

Appeal dismissed, with $10 costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The notice of appeal herein states that the appeal is taken from an order bearing date the 2d day of February 1916. No such order appears in the record. There is an order in the record dated February 25, 1916, but as the notice of-appeal merely refers to an order by its date, and makes no mention of the contents or nature of the order, it is impossible to determine that the notice of appeal refers to the order dated February 25, 1916. The appeal must therefore be dismissed.

Appeal dismissed, with $10 costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

159 N.Y.S. 787, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/agulnick-v-rauch-nyappterm-1916.