Aguirre v. New Braunfels Ind

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedNovember 14, 2002
Docket02-50332
StatusUnpublished

This text of Aguirre v. New Braunfels Ind (Aguirre v. New Braunfels Ind) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Aguirre v. New Braunfels Ind, (5th Cir. 2002).

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-50332 Summary Calendar

SERGIO AGUIRRE,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

NEW BRAUNFELS INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT,

Defendant- Appellant.

-------------------------------------------------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. SA-02-CV-47 -------------------------------------------------------------- November 13, 2002

Before JONES, STEWART and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

New Braunfels Independent School District (“NBISD”) appeals the district court’s order

requiring it to pay at torney fees to Sergio Aguirre (“Aguirre”) for improperly removing Aguirre’s

state court suit against NBISD to federal court. Aguirre had filed a “Petition for Trial De Novo” in

the state district court seeking to reverse NBISD’s decision expelling Aguirre from high school for

possessing an alcoholic beverage on school property.

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. The district court did not abuse its discretion in ordering NBISD to pay Aguirre’s attorney

fees incurred as a result of the removal, in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 1447(c). Although the

petition adverted to violations of “due process,” it is apparent that the petition sought to invoke the

provision of the Texas Education Code allowing a state-court de novo trial on the merits of a school

board’s expulsion decision. See TEX. EDUC. CODE § 37.009(f) (“The decision of the board may be

appealed by trial de novo to a district court of the county in which the school district’s central

administrative office is located.”). Thus, there was not an objectively reasonable basis to believe that

removal was proper. See Valdes v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 199 F.3d 290, 293 (5th Cir. 2000).

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Valdes v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
199 F.3d 290 (Fifth Circuit, 2000)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Aguirre v. New Braunfels Ind, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/aguirre-v-new-braunfels-ind-ca5-2002.