Aguirre v. 635 Madison Fee Prop. Owner LLC
This text of 2025 NY Slip Op 30039(U) (Aguirre v. 635 Madison Fee Prop. Owner LLC) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court, New York County primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Aguirre v 635 Madison Fee Prop. Owner LLC 2025 NY Slip Op 30039(U) January 7, 2025 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: Index No. 151111/2021 Judge: Mary V. Rosado Cases posted with a "30000" identifier, i.e., 2013 NY Slip Op 30001(U), are republished from various New York State and local government sources, including the New York State Unified Court System's eCourts Service. This opinion is uncorrected and not selected for official publication. INDEX NO. 151111/2021 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 435 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 01/07/2025
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK NEW YORK COUNTY PRESENT: HON. MARY V. ROSADO PART 33M Justice ,-------------------------------------------------------X 151111/2021 INDEX NO. JEAN AGUIRRE, MOTION DATE 06/03/2024 Plaintiff, MOTION SEQ. NO. 007 - V -
635 MADISON FEE PROPERTY OWNER LLC,TECTONIC BUILDERS INC.,BRONXDALE ELECTRIC INC.,IRONWOOD DECISION + ORDER ON REAL TY CORPORATION, RICHEMONT NORTH AMERICA, INC., MONTBLANC, MOTION
Defendant. ------------------------------------------------------------------------X
RICHEMONT NORTH AMERICA, INC. and MONTBLANC
Plaintiffs, Third-Party Index No. 154132/2021 - V -
TECTONIC BUILDERS INC.
Defendant. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------X
TECTONIC BUILDERS INC. Second Third-Party Index No. 595529/2021 Plaintiff,
-against-
PRACTICAL PLUMBING AND HEATING INC.
Defendant. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------X
The following e-filed documents, listed by NYSCEF document number (Motion 007) 346, 347, 348, 349, 350,351,352,353,354,355,356,357,358,359,360,361,362,363,364,365,366,367,368,369,370, 371,372,373,374,375,376,377,378,379,380,381,382,383,384,385,386,387,388,389,401,402, 403,404,405,406,407,408,411,412,413,414,415,416,417,418,419,420,421,422 were read on this motion to/for JUDGMENT - SUMMARY
Upon the foregoing documents, and after a final submission date August 12, 2024, Second
Third-Party Defendant Practical Plumbing and Heating Inc.'s ("Practical") motion for summary
judgment is granted in part and denied in part. 15111112021 AGUIRRE, JEAN vs. 635 MADISON FEE PROPERTY Page 1 of 4 Motion No. 007
[* 1] 1 of 4 INDEX NO. 151111/2021 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 435 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 01/07/2025
For a more thorough recitation of the facts, the reader is referred to the Court's Decision
and Order on Motion Sequence 003. Here, Practical seeks summary judgment on multiple grounds
against multiple parties. 1
First, Practical seeks summary judgment dismissing all claims and crossclaims asserted
against it pursuant to Workers' Compensation Law § 11. This portion of the motion is denied for
the reasons stated in Motion Sequence 002. Just as in Motion Sequence 002, here there are triable
issues of fact as to whether Plaintiff Jean Aguirre's ("Plaintiff'') traumatic brain injury has led to
his permanent and total disability.
Second, Practical seeks summary judgment dismissing Bronxdale Electric, Inc.' s
("Bronxdale") claim for contractual indemnification as there exists no contract between the parties.
This portion of the motion is granted as there is no contract between Bronxdale and Practical.
Third, Practical seeks summary judgment dismissing 635 Madison Fee Property Owner,
LLC, Ironwood Realty Corporation, Richemont North America, Inc., and Montblanc's claims for
contractual indemnification. This portion of the motion is denied as the Court has already found
in motion sequence 002 that these parties are entitled to contractual indemnification from Practical.
Fourth, Practical seeks dismissal of Tectonic Builders Inc.'s ("Tectonic") claim for
contractual indemnification. For the same reasons stated in motion sequence 004, this portion of
the motion is denied. Just as in motion sequence 004, here there are triable issues of fact as to both
Tectonic' sand Practical' s negligence which makes ruling on the contractual indemnification claim
premature (York v Tappan Zee Constructors, LLC, 224 AD3d 527, 529 [1st Dept 2024]; Bradley
1 Second Third-Party Defendant Tectonic Builders Inc. opposes the motion based on its timeliness. However, in the interest of deciding the case on the merits, and pursuant to CPLR 2004, the Court elects to hear the motion. In any event, most if not all of the issues presented in this motion have already been litigated and decided in the parties' numerous other motions and cross-motions for summary judgment. 151111/2021 AGUIRRE, JEAN vs. 635 MADISON FEE PROPERTY Page 2 of 4 Motion No. 007
2 of 4 [* 2] INDEX NO. 151111/2021 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 435 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 01/07/2025
v NYU Langone Hospitals, 223 AD3d 509, 511-512 [1st Dept 2024]; Spielmann v 170 Broadway
NYC LP, 187 AD3d 492 [1st Dept 2020]).
Finally, Practical seeks spoliation sanctions against Tectonic for its destruction of the
ladder which caused Plaintiff's injury. The Court is granted broad discretion in determining
spoliation sanctions, but the sanction must reflect an appropriate balancing under the
circumstances (Arbor Realty funding, LLC v Herrick Feinstein LLP, 140 AD3d 607 [1st Dept
2016]). A motion court, may, in its discretion, defer to a trial court a determination of "whether or
what sanction to impose" (AIG Property Casualty Co. v MTS Power Systems, 231 AD3d 591 [1st
Dept 2024] quoting Butler v New York City Tr. Auth., 192 AD3d 623,624 [1st Dept 2021]).
Here, the Court denies Practical's motion for spoliation sanctions without prejudice, with
leave to renew at the time of trial. The trial court, assessing the evidence and witnesses before it,
is better situated to determine the relevance of the allegedly spoliated evidence, and the culpability
of the allegedly spoliating party (see also Quinn v City University ofNew York, 43 AD3d 679,680
[1st Dept 2007]).
Accordingly, it is hereby,
ORDERED that Second Third-Party Defendant Practical Plumbing and Heating Inc.'s
motion is granted in part and denied in part; and it is further
ORDERED that Second Third-Party Defendant Practical Plumbing and Heating Inc. 's
motion for summary judgment dismissing Defendant Bronxdale Electric Inc. 's motion seeking
dismissal of Bronxdale Electric Inc.' s motion for contractual indemnification is granted; and it is
further
ORDERED that Second Third-Party Defendant Practical Plumbing and Heating Inc.'s
motion for spoliation sanctions against Defendant/Third-Party Defendant/Second Third-Party
151111/2021 AGUIRRE, JEAN vs. 635 MADISON FEE PROPERTY Page 3 of 4 Motion No. 007
[* 3] 3 of 4 INDEX NO. 151111/2021 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 435 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 01/07/2025
Plaintiff Tectonic Builders Inc.'s is denied, without prejudice, with leave to renew at the time of
trial, and it is further
ORDERED that Second Third-Party Defendant Practical Plumbing and Heating Inc.' s
motion seeking dismissal of all claims and crossclaims asserted against it pursuant to Workers '
Compensation Law § 11 is denied; and it is further
ORDERED that Second Third-Party Defendant Practical Plumbing and Heating Inc. ' s
motion seeking dismissal 635 Madison Fee Property Owner, LLC, Ironwood Realty Corporation,
Richemont North America, Inc. , and Montblanc ' s claims for contractual indemnification is denied;
and it is further
ORDERED Second Third-Party Defendant Practical Plumbing and Heating Inc.' s motion
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2025 NY Slip Op 30039(U), Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/aguirre-v-635-madison-fee-prop-owner-llc-nysupctnewyork-2025.