Aguilera v. State

521 So. 2d 319, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 620, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 924, 1988 WL 18611
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Aguilera v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 13 Fla. L. Weekly 1401
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 8, 1988·No. No. 88-54·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant contends, by this appeal from a ruling denying his Rule 3.850 motion for post conviction relief, that the court erred in sentencing him to three consecutive three-year mandatory minimum sentences for use of a firearm, where all three offenses arose out of a single criminal episode. We agree, and the State concedes, that the stacked mandatory minimum sentences violate the dictates of Palmer v. State, 438 So.2d 1 (Fla.1983), which has retroactive application, Cisnero v. State, 458 So.2d 377 (Fla. 2d DCA 1984).

The cause is remanded for a correction of sentence so that the minimum mandatory sentences run concurrently.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Aguilera v. State, 521 So. 2d 319, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 620, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 924, 1988 WL 18611 (Fla. Ct. App. 1988).

521 So. 2d 319 (Aguilera v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Cisnero v. State
458 So. 2d 377 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1984)